By Guy Wheatley
The Texarkana Gazette
Monsters, Inc., like most animated movies, works with two concurrent
themes.
The overt story line gives the movie its premise, and the excuse for
a lot of the physical humor that keeps the action moving. It is still funny
to see people, or monsters, fall down.
Pixar has again built a computer-generated world around the genius
of live actors. The two main characters give us Billy Crystal (Mike) and
John Goodman (Sully) at their comedic best. The visual hyperbole that the
computer allows would be little more than an attractive screen saver without
the personality these two bring to their characters. The comedy works from
the slapstick level up to a sophisticated Dilbertesk look at the work place.
Movie theaters will be filled with the delighted shrieks of children laughing
at the pratfalls, and the knowing chuckles of their parents recognizing
workplace conundrums.
Hidden within the humor is a cautionary tale about loosing ones moral
identity to the job. We often define who we are by what we do. This person
is an insurance salesman, that one is an engineer. The lovable ,and not
so lovable, inhabitants of Monstropolis also strongly identify with their
jobs. The less than friendly competition between Sully and one of his fellow
"Scarers," lets us see how much of their self worth is derived from the
job. Their dependence on the corporate identity allows them to develop
a miss-placed loyalty, and ignore the repulsive aspect of scaring children
for a living.
This part of the movie plods its way to a predictably simplistic ending.
The redeeming quality of this film is not to be found in its attempt to
tackle ethical issues. What makes this movie worth the admission price
is its sweetness. There is a scene close to the end where Billy Crystal's
character is trying to get some laughs. He starts out with a sophisticated
stand up routine. He eventually gives up and resorts to swallowing his
microphone to get laughs. Pixar would do well to follow his example.
As with earlier efforts by Pixar, the computer animation works well
with non-human subjects. The animators understand mass and gravity well
enough to avoid distracting flaws. So much of the movie depends on fast
paced chase scenes. The characters are running through a huge factory.
The cinematography effectively conveys the since of size and height necessary
for the door chase scene to work. When a character peers over a precipice,
the audience believes that it is a long way down.
When a human character is introduced, the effect is not seamless. The
baby girl who turns the monster world upside down, looks as much like her
toys as the human characters in the Toy Story movies. The audience is distracted,
by trying to fit her into the proper context. The saving grace here is
John Goodman's ability to convey the growing affection his character feels
for her. If the little girl doesn't seem real, Sulley's growing fondness
for her does.
This is a good movie that parents will enjoy as much as their children
do. Best of all, there are no innuendoes that will require embarrassing
explanations, and no language that parents don't want their children to
hear.
Back to Movie Index
Back to Writing Index
Back to Home page